Perfect for: individuals who want something bigger compared to Tinder experience, and so are happy to pay it off
The major players are primarily mobile apps that barely have a website at all, let alone let you use their basic functionalities on desktop, and it’s hard to imagine that trend reversing itself at this point in the history of online dating.
Apps whose bread and butter is geo-location —Grindr, Tinder, and Bumble — have all but wiped conventional sites that are dating the map. or more it can appear.
Zoosk, first launched in Ca in 2007 as a desktop-only site that is dating has mostly was able to keep speed using its mobile-first rivals, boasting tens of an incredible number of users, a modern-looking software, and personality-focused matching algorithms that its app-based rivals mainly lack.
But with complete account costing more or less $150 per year, can Zoosk overcome the title recognition space that exists between it and its own more youthful, a lot more popular rivals, while holding down more conventional site that is dating like OkCupid and Match?